Folks,

I am sure, at some point in our lives we have come across a woman who answers to the following criteria

She bitches about how much men suck, why men are so stupid and how “studies have shown that women are smarter than men”

She goes on and on about how men are only interested in sex, while she doesn't refrain from wearing push-up bras, halter necks, skirts that could be called “belts”, see-through tops, and thong bikinis, but she calls it “empowerment”.

She can never tire of bitching about how every problem in society has been brought about by males, and no female was responsible for atomic bombs.

Pounces and rips apart any man who refers to a woman as a “Chick” or “babe” or “broad”.

Loves to spout meaningless horseshit like “I am a woman! Hear me roar!” and spells women as wymyn.

Is a closet slut but claims to be a “Feminist”. i.e. She equates feminism with “sleep with anything with a functioning dick just to show them I can”.

Considers all sport to be “male homoeroticism”, loves men who are complete pussies (“metrosexuals”) so that they can bitch-slap them into submission.


I am referring of course to “feminazis”. (About the only thing Rush Limbaugh did while existing on this planet was to coin that term. Who knows? Maybe that may be his one shot at a ticket out of hell, where little devils puncture his corpulent carcass with little pitchforks while Polka music blares in the background?)

As with most of my rants I got the inspiration to do this after a chat with a friend. Now she cannot be considered a “feminazi” in any way but she did spout the dumbest horseshit I have heard, like “women are smarter than men”. I of course disagreed, saying that they are both just as dumb, and saying one is smarter than the other is like saying an artichoke is smarter than a tomato.

She then went on to say “well, research has proven it”. So I decided to look for this “research” and who conducted this damned thing because it's fundamentally a flawed topic to do research on. Most papers I found tended the verdict as “inconclusive”, and generally pointed out that there are differences but that doesn't make one superior to the other. I am still waiting for conclusive, unbiased proof.

Why I say it is a flawed topic to do research on? Simply because men and women are not homogeneous groups. How can you compare people of different ethnicities, coming from different educational backgrounds, different life experiences and then assign a degree of smartness worthy of comparison? Would a group of African women from Inner Congo be smarter than a group of men from the ghettos of New York? Even within a similar demographic, can we extend results across the whole human race? Sex is probably one of a thousand other determinants of intelligence. I wonder though, if any scientist would dare to publish that men are smarter than women. It would take much more courage to do that than to point out that women are smarter.

Now before I go on to the rant proper, Some things I would like to clarify, for those really stupid idiots who immediately start getting a hernia reading something like this.

I am all for gender equality, and by equality I mean real equality.

I am all for a woman's right to choose what she does with her body

I am aware that gender equality will always be a contentious issue. Women have been and still are victims of discrimination of one form or another. I do not condone it but it's not going to go away.

I am not afraid of strong, self assured women. I like them, in fact.

Now the niceties are out of the way, it's time to get a bit dirty.

Feminazis suck. That's the purpose of this rant. It is to show how misguided, ignorant, bigoted and downright evil militant feminists can be. These female fundies have got to go, preferably up in smoke in front of a giant image of a rubber dick. Some of the shit they love to spout:

“Every evil in the world is caused by men!” Yeah? Like women are perfect angels in human-shape, incapable of doing wrong. Let me tell you the tale of a few perfectly shining examples of womanhood:

Elizabeth Bathory: She, along with Vlad the Impaler, was the inspiration for Bram Stoker's “Dracula”. By all accounts, her cruelty and savagery matched Vlad's. Here is a little account: Elizabeth Bathory was born to a rich Transylvanian family and was a countess. Generations of inbreeding had probably made her mentally unstable, and she, in her “reign” of about twenty years she tortured and killed six hundred young girls. She was convinced that the secret to youth and beauty was to bathe in the blood of virgins, and her castle was filled with the most macabre and disgusting collection of paraphernalia ever to issue from the local ironmonger.

It all started “harmlessly” enough with some simple torture and fun:

With the aid of this crew, Elizabeth made Castle Csejthe to a place of pure evil. She would always find excuses to inflict punishment and torture, upon her young servant girls. She preferred to having the victim stripped naked and then whip the girl on the front of her nude body rather than the back not only for the increased damage this would do, but so that she then could watch their faces contort in horror at their most grim and burning fate. Another favorite was when she would stick pins, in various sensitive places on the victims body, such as under fingernails.

Until....

A young chambermaid accidentally pulled Elizabeth Bathory's hair while combing it. The infuriated Countess slapped the girl's head so hard, that blood spurted from her nose, which splashed upon her own hand. Where the blood had touched her skin, Elizabeth immediately though it took on the freshness of her young chambermaid's skin. She then got hold of Johannes Ujvary and Dorka to undress the young girl, upon holding her arms over a big vat, then they cut her arteries. After the young girl was dead Elizabeth then stepped into the vat, and took a bath in her chambermaid's blood. She was now sure, she had found the secret of eternal youth through this vampirism. She had discovered that blood is life.

When the authorities got wind of it they decided to raid (She had “moved on” from peasant girls to nobility):

On December 30, 1610. A band of soldiers led by Elizabeth's own cousin, raided Castle Csejthe at night. They were horrified by the terrible sights in the castle. A dead girl was lying in the main hall, drained of blood, another girl, who had her body pierced, was still alive. In the dungeon they later discovered, were several girls waiting in prison cells, some of whose bodies had been tortured. Below the castle, they found the bodies of some 50 dead girls.

Another shining example of womanhood: Empress Wu Zetian of China (Tang Dynasty): This shining matriarch killed her rival to the throne, dismembered her body and immersed her in vats of wine to die, she killed her niece and framed her rival, thus elevating her status in the eyes of a weakening emperor. She established her own “male harems” (So much for the long suffering woman), she killed her own eldest son (what a loving mother), and installed her weak youngest puppet son so her authority will not be diminished. She presided over what was possibly fifty years of utter brutality and despotism. Incidentally many feminist sites consider her a great example of a real woman. Interesting indeed! Oh, and the Empress Dowager, Cixi, used up the defence budget to build a new summer palace for herself. While she bathed in luxury, the Chinese had to try fending off the invading Japanese navy by ramming their ships against the enemy. I wonder if Osucky big Cocken got his idea from this?

Onto modern times, Phoolan Devi: The Bandit Queen of Bihar. This woman has been lionised as a champion of the downtrodden, women and the “untouchables” in ultra-rural India. To be fair to her, she was treated brutally and victimised for what she was, and hence there was a thirst for vengeance in her but her bloodlust led to this:

Her men ransacked the village as she waited by the well where she was forced to fetch water for Sri Ram. After an hour her men returned and reported that the Ram brothers were not there. Phoolan refused to believe that they had slipped away. She was convinced that the villagers were hiding them. She ordered her bandits to round up all the young thakur men and bring them to the town square. The bandits lined up the thakurs, and Phoolan dressed them down, threatening to "roast" them alive if they did not tell her the truth. She punctuated her threats with blows to the men's groins with the butt of her rifle. The thakurs pleaded their ignorance, but this only enraged Phoolan more. She ordered her men to march the thakurs to the river where they were forced to kneel on the banks. Gunfire from multiple weapons shattered the air. Bodies keeled over and fell lifeless into the mud. When the shooting stopped, 22 of the 30 young men were dead, in what was possibly the worst instance of gang-killing in modern India. Her hatred towards her oppressors translated to a hatred towards everything male. While she should have found illiteracy and superstition, she chose to victimize males. This is a woman who is nearly worshipped by so many feminazis in the world.

Feminists love pointing out the brutal dictatorships in the past that were run by men, but those that were run by women weren't much better either. Regardless of sex, men and women respond the same way to power. So many of Hitler's willing minions were women. Just google Irma Grese to know more.

Feminists love to point out how men can only think about sex. Well what's wrong with sex? It has kept us alive all this while. Secondly, why shouldn't men think about sex? Why are men made to feel guilty about thinking about sex? If only men thought about sex, why is there such a huge market for lingerie, push-up bras, slimming products, dildos, vibrators and RU486? I walked into enough sex shops in my time and just like for every 10 porn mags for men there is one for women, for every fifty brands of dildos for women there is probably one blow up doll or fake pussy, and it doesn't even look all that realistic. Why are men made to feel bad about what they feel naturally? Cosmopolitan, and other feminine magazines are chockful of articles on how to have “great sex”, fifty ways to have mindblowing sex, two hundred ways to insert his dick into a watermelon and then eat if off... What are these articles doing in woman mags? The sales of these magazines I think can be easily compared to the sale of Penthouse or Juggs Monthly. Please don't give me the shit about “oh these magazines also have other articles”. Oh yeah? So does Playboy, so quit being a hypocritical bitch. Men think so much about sex because it feels so damn good, not because it is immature or anything, just like women. Talking about sex, feminazis get their panties in a bunch if a man so much as looks at a girl's cleavage. Hey bitch, if you don't want a man to look at a girl's tits, tell the girl to not show them! It's pretty hard to gawk at a burkha-wearing woman. A feminazi's hypocrisy is laid bare for all to see when she “empowers” herself by wearing what she wants and then berating the men for looking at her. Ever seen the feminazi at work? She'll be the one in a “three piece power suit” that is “designed for a man but made for a woman”, imitating men, behaving like men, and then claiming to hate men.

Another common gripe feminists have is “men get paid more than women!”

In Singapore, those who serve the armed forces for two years (all males) get a higher starting salary in the civil service to offset the two years of forced labour and indoctrination, or National Service, which means that they enter the workforce two years later when their female counterparts would have already moved on to higher cadres. This apparently pisses feminists off. Now I am all for equal pay but the hypocrisy of this is simply too glaring. These women want equal pay without equal responsibility. If they want equal pay why don't they volunteer for national service and join their male counterparts in combat fatigues for two years? I actually heard say “oh but we have periods and shit, and we bear kids!” What the fuck..? Since when did that become grounds for not being able to wear an army uniform? No one is forcing you to have kids. If you think that by having kids you are doing the men a favour then don't bother. In other countries I cannot comment because I don't know what the situation is, but here in Singapore, demanding equal rights without shouldering equal responsibilities is, to me, bloody hypocritical.

Feminazis who aren't lesbians love to talk about “commitment” which in their parlance means “I can screw around, you look at another girl, you're sleeping on the couch for a year”. A friend of mine happened to have the misfortune of dating one of these fucks. Ten months, and $25000 later, she left him because he was “hindering her walk with the Lord” (nothing like a fundy feminazi). What did he get out of it? Not even a proper kiss. The bitch conned him out of twenty five THOUSAND dollars, lured him with plans of a happy married life, provided he was committed, was insanely jealous if he as much as talked to any other female, only to dump his ass ten months later, nearly screwing his life up (She got her comeuppance but that is another story). Another friend of mine had an insanely jealous girlfriend who made him completely stop meeting his male AND female friends only to suddenly declare that she was lesbian and was leaving him. Holy-fucking-shit! Why do these manipulative cunts deserve anything but contempt? Of course feminazis would point out that the men were too stupid to realise that they are being taken for a ride. I would like to meet these bitches and have a go at their skulls with a fucking crowbar, and then point out that they were too dumb to not get out of the way.

Feminazis love to point out that every evil invention was a result of men, from the knife to the atomic bomb. What about all the good shit men invented? Fuck, it was a man who discovered the nylon that goes into the bras you love to burn, it was a man who invented the safety razors you don't shave with, it was a man who invented the morning after pill that you take after porking some parking attendant after a night of insane drinking and name-calling, it was a man who invented the triple speed multiorgasmic vibrator you use in your pussy, it was a man who invented the cooking grill, it was a man who discovered electricity, it was a man who discovered hydroelectric projects, it was a man who invented concrete to build your bloody houses with, a man who invented magic markers for you to make your protest signs so shut the fuck up with the bitching for a change.

Speaking of periods, feminazis want me to “understand” and empathise with their insanely cranky behaviour during the days they bleed (no I am not going to use euphemisms here) while themselves getting away with the worst kind of name calling. Feminists consider words like “babe”, “bitch”, “hoe”, “broad”, “chick” etc offensive. What can be so offensive about such words? They on the other hand are willing to call guys “jerks”, “assholes”, “dickheads”, “dogs” (and other fauna from aardvark upto and including the zebra), “bastards”, etc etc. Hypocrisy, thy name is woman!

And what's this shit about beauty contests and the pornography industry? Feminazis tell me that pornography is degrading to women. How so, may I ask? It portrays women to be sex objects to be used by men. Hey, apart from dodgy videos coming out of Bumfuck Egypt with grainy footage of a three year old girl blowing a donkey, most “mainstream” porn is produced with full consent of the participants. These women want to be treated as “sex objects”. No one held a gun to their heads and asked them to smile as guys held their dicks over their faces and came on them. Feminists talk about beauty contests perpetuating stereotypes of what males considered beauty. Bullshit. If males could define beauty, piewagons like Marilyn Monroe and Liz Taylor would be supermodels, as opposed to the anorexic, paper-thin, peroxided, bimbotic, airheads of today. It has always been women who have been defining what beauty is, not men. Men are not that picky. As long as it looks fairly decent, we'll fuck it. Does anyone seriously think a man came up with the concept of stiletto heels? A man wears shoes to cover his feet and prevent injury. The idea of wearing them just to show off their legs or look taller is completely woman. Does anyone seriously wants to claim that a man came up with the concept of a feather boa? Does anyone in his/her right mind wants to assert that it was a man who came up with the miniskirt? No we didn't! It was the man who came up with the burkha, it was a man who said women should cover their hair in church and it was a man who came up with the nine-yard saree, and who the hell wears those things today?

These feminazis wouldn't be so pervasive had they not their unwitting winged monkeys, the “new” pussified “metrosexual” male. Trust a woman to come up with a term like “metrosexual”. My guess is, she is a white woman who bases her life on Cosmo, finds meaning in “Sex and the City”, practices Tai Chi, and calls her kids “Charity” and “Dandelion”. Feminazis, like other powerfreaks (including many men), are unnerved by strong, self-assured men who can see through their bullshit. Their worst enemy is a man who can actually point out that gender and intelligence need not always be linked. They hate a man who can dress decently, but not flashily, because that would damage their fragile worldview that men are too stupid to button their flies. Their nemesis is a man who busts his ass to put food on his table, who is the head of the house not because he is the man, but because he works his ass off. They hate a man who loves sex, because in their warped worldview, sex with a man is filthy. They want a man whom they can pussywhip to submission without him even knowing it. They want a man devoid of maleness, devoid of male sexuality (yes there is such a thing, so eat shit). The “metrosexual” is usually filthy rich, loves to spend, buys designer-wear by the truckload, does his hair in a different way every other week, can cook a total of three fancy dishes, and even admits to wearing female underwear, i.e. A rich woman in a rich man's body, completely “sanitised”, devoid of male-ego, hell almost a woman. Think pansy-boy David Beckham and his bitch-wife. They want the men to act like women, and elevate them to a higher pedestral. The metrosexual phenomenon itself was not started by women (that is a different rant altogether), but they certainly have helped evangelise it to the world by giving it a nice name.

Feminazis talk about empowerment for women but not by their upliftment, they couldn't care less about the problems faced by a woman in Ethiopia who has nothing to eat for weeks. They couldn't care less for women who genuinely want to be housewives or help their career minded husbands. They treat any other brand of feminism but their own with utter contempt and condescension. They care however whether I say “manhole” and not “personhole” cover. They get uppity if I call a lesbian a “Dyke” or if I even DARE to hint that maybe men could have an edge over women in anything but brute strength (Even that would be challenged by these nutjobs). They see sexual connotations and male “insecurities” in EVERYTHING from the shape of missiles and bullets to The Three Stooges, and if Jerry Falwell hadn't beaten them to it, they would have been the first to assert that the purple tellytubby was a suppressed closet homosexual.

Fuck them to hell.