Folks,
When I read this, I couldn't help bursting out laughing.
http://www.hartfordadvocate.com/gbase/News/content?oid=oid:107862
Imagine this if you will.
A 280lb man, whose prime qualification in his life has been the ability to body-slam Andre the Giant, has been invited by the University of Connecticut College Republicans to give a SPEECH on how Liberalism is an "Abyss of moral relativity". This, by a guy who changed his legal name to "Warrior" (that's it: Warrior) from Jim Helwig, just so he could keep his Ultimate Warrior gimmick.
You had to laugh, didn't you?
What the fuck were these idiots thinking? Have they heard this nutjob? Even when he was in the WWF (or WWE) he was barely comprehensible! This was a man who had these immense words of wisdom to impart to a potential opponent before a match:
"Between knowledge of “What is life” and “What is death”…lies a battlefield of purpose before all “beings”…in its simplest form we are all animals, affected by evolution, seeking survival of self, i.e. BEING. Within the earth plane, “survival of self” only exists by the consistent challenge and negotiation of rules and regulations.”
- Warrior #1, May 1996.
Wha..? What fucking language was that? Even Ayn fucking Rand at her most insane self was slightly more coherent than this; and THIS is a man that the College Republicans of UConn thought was fit to air their noble cause. This pituitary retard, high on steroids, with enough intellect to barely keep his eyes open and not drool at the same time, is supposed to be an icon for conservatism.
Well good news for us on the left wing because this one is almost too easy. It's like beating up a 3 year old.
He proceeded to shit all over himself that memorable night at UConn. After rounds and rounds of heckling and name calling ("queering doesn't make the world work"; yup, another world beater that means NOTHING whatsoever), he was thrown out of the place, the UConn College Republicans had to send apology letters to groups that this mongoloid freak insulted. "Queering doesn't make the world work"; this from a man who wears skintight tiny speedos, gropes other men, IN public, hugs them, tosses them, hell, even lies on them telling the rest of the world that "queering doesn't make the world work". Oh the fucking irony of it all! The tassels wrapped tightly round his arms must have cut off too much blood to his brain.
Stupid as the UW was, I never understood what the hell was he doing in a university in the first place. This is a guy, mind you, who couldn't even hold on to a wrestling job with his limited wrestling ability in the first place (his repertoire, even in that notorious snoozefest, the WWE, was just four moves: Clotheslines, shoulder block, gorilla press and a fucking splash, that's it). What qualifications does this idiot who couldn't string a coherent sentence even in the fucking WWF which was and is the realm of redneck failed gasstation attendants, have to speak in a university forum? Whatever the college republicans have been smoking it must have been some pretty good shit.
Being a sucker for the humourous I went over to this dipshit's website and words will not do justice to this guy's views. I mean, anyone even remotely sane would think a few times before hiring an idiot who claims to invent words like "Destrucity" and "Foke". Here's his own take on his baby:
""Foke" is the warrior's term for what humanity [collectively] calls focus. The "us" in foc[us] implies the word "we", a collective; a group. In a warrior's world, the decideable (make up one's mind) duty of one's own foke, in it's purest form, delimits the dependence on any other."
Could you seriously believe that this man could give a coherent speech, much less an academic one?
7 comments:
it is appalling how that university could actually allow that. and their rational behind their preposterous decision is even more absurd than the actual decision. It is just surprisng as to how "but he seemed like a decent guy. We thought he may appeal to more people than just political nerds" is actually an apparent reasoning behind the actual act of bringing a fucktard who used to grab sweaty crotches, hoping for him to give insight and to speak on liberalism. i am absolutely insulted, even though i was not part of the audience, that this sholuld occur to people who are part of the governance of political matters at hand in a public sphere of sorts in a school entity. This ridicule is worthy of my disdain.
my point was that an Academic Institution allowed, in your words, a mere wrestler to speak on THEIR behalf on the grounds of "he seemed like a decent guy". It does not say much about the school does it. i didn't say idiots should not talk about liberalism, i merely questioned the act of letting an idiot speak to a school of students. As a rally of sorts, he might enlighten the public and help them towards the liberal cause, or he might cause unrest (which he did).
And then you will say, he was praticing his right to freedom of speech.
well with it, comes responsibility. in singapore you are allowed to speak in the speakers corner, if you adhere to guidelines and your material will be screened. i daresay an efective way to weed out people who purposefully want to cause unrest, or "idiots".
Only one who is foolish, will believe in freedom of speech. Freedom of speech is not as you see it. It is not that you are allowed to say what you think, it more like what you say, you are held accountable for.
And religion to this date, is by far the most biased tool that we have created. Religion divides us. Abolish religion, and most of the worlds problems will be solved.
Post a Comment