Rape

Folks,

First of all, women stop reading. I am going to offend you. Do not progress any further because it would result in you turning beet red, hyperventilating, random acts of misdirected anger, killing of small, furry mammals and in some cases, spittle-choke and death.

Well, some of you need that anyway, but please, do us all a favour and don't read this.

So all men here? Good.

Do me a favour and ask a woman, any woman. It could be the skankiest whore on the street or the mother superior in some nunnery. Ask them this: "Should someone deserve the death penalty for rape".

Chances are nine of ten would scream "yes"!

At this point, walk away. Do not even attempt to argue with them whether such a serious sentence should be given for, what is admittedly a crime that is serious but certainly not worth hanging the poor bastard.

I tried.

Apart from being called a "fucking misogynistic bastard" and being "seriously fucked in the head", I got to hear a lecture on what a heinous crime it is and how I will never understand what a woman goes through. And all this while I was thinking, 'isn't rape when something goes through a woman, rather than the other way round?" Okay, that was what I was thinking, not what I said. The maniacal woman looked like she would cut my goolies off if I pushed her too far over the edge, so I kept my mouth shut.

I mean, why is rape such a 'special' crime? Sure it's a serious crime and everything but why do women get so damn hysterical over it? Is rape a more serious crime than grievous bodily hurt? I don't think so. I actually asked the cunt above, so by your logic, if a man rapes a woman he should be sentenced to death, but if he cuts her arms off, and she lives, he shouldn't. She actually said this: 'I don't know all that but he should die if he rapes a woman'. Sheesh, what do they teach in those damned universities? Certainly not consistency and logical thought.

Is rape a more serious crime than kidnapping? I don't think so. I mean people get so worked up when someone is kidnapped and raped, not because she was kidnapped in the first place but that someone had the gall to rape her even. Well duh! What the hell did the guy kidnap her for? To put her up for a nice club membership? To bring her out to a nice dinner and dance? Come on, if someone kidnaps another person, chances are it's for sexual thrills, so why get so worked up over the secondary crime and not the first one?

Is rape more serious than attempted murder? Certainly not. Attempted murder would nearly kill your ass and may leave you, in some cases, permanently physically disfigured, rape is 10 minutes of discomfort in comparison. Note, you cunts, I said 'in comparison'. Gosh do I have to make it all so damn explicit for you fucks?!

Shouldn't we start talking about real, no bullshit equality and stop treating certain crimes as extra special simply because they are committed on women? Sure, the woman who is raped goes through shit for her whole life but so what?! A man who has been mugged in the street by ten gangsters also goes through shit. So why should one crime be treated more severely simply because men are expected to have better coping mechanisms? Why no one ever gives a shit about what a man who is a crime-victim goes through? When some skankwhore who would fuck a shoe if it put on a natty tie gets banged up in a dark alley, it's all about how it has affected her so psychologically, and how the man who did it deserves to die, but if a man has been robbed and stabbed? No one gives a shit about the victim. No support groups exist for these people but for rape victims who have to undergo the same kind of feeling? Clamours for lynch mobs and hangings go up quicker than a clergyman's member upon sighting an altar boy's naked rear end.

If any of you women are still reading this shit, go away. Some women bullshit about how 'men will never understand what it's like being raped'. Here is my well thought out, calm, logical response to them:

Unless you have been raped, you will never understand too. In fact even if you have been raped you can only speak for yourself and not for the rest of womankind. Simply having a set of organs in common does not automatically mean you all share the same brain. Or, maybe some of you do. What makes you so damn sure you understand how every woman feels? Hell, you know maybe out there some woman enjoys being raped. I mean there are people out there who like to fuck shit and dead bodies. Surely out there, there is a woman who enjoys being raped. So on what basis do you claim that only 'men have no idea what's it like being raped'? Neither do most women. If you can logically justify it, then try me. Or else, shut the fuck up. We have heard your arguments and we find it silly. Don't start on the usual 'you have no idea' or 'I can't explain it to you and won't bother'. It basically means you have no fucking clue what you're talking about. Quit thinking you're so damn special. Welcome to the human race.

Also, before you start ranting that 'maybe you need someone close to you to suffer it, then we'll see how you talk' let me pre-empt that idiotic argument as well. Look, douchebag, if someone harms someone close to me, I'll kill the bastard stone dead, but that does not automatically mean the law should be based on that. Fuck, I would kill anyone who lays a finger on my antique collection of books without permission but you don't see me advocating that punishment for everyone! You cunts are too dumb to realise that the law cannot be based on what certain individuals feel or think. It must be unbiased. And the unbiased view is, rape is no more (or less) a serious crime than the thousands of crimes committed out there.

If women want rape to be sentenced by death, here's a list of crimes that are far more serious than rape and hence should also be sentenceable by death.

--> Putting carcinogens in the air (So hang all smokers. I think a person who has been given cancer goes through much more shit than someone who has been raped. If you feminazi bitches think otherwise, do us a favour and kill yourself. Slowly. On national television)
--> Drink driving (What, if a person drinks and rapes someone he is charged with rape with no mitigating grounds, and when he runs over someone with a car in that state it's not considered murder?)
--> Spreading HIV (Same crime as cancer, different tools)
--> Corporate fraud (stealing from 90 year old biddies by wiping their retirement savings clean is far worse than rape. Slow starvation hurts more than ten minutes of semi-limp dick)
--> Retrenchment to boost bottom line (in my book, this is aiding and abetting crime)
--> Breaking and entering
--> Withholding essential medical aid for money (let's hang half the doctors)
--> Medical incompetence (we pay these schmucks millions to leave a fucking screwdriver in your intestines? Fuck that! HANG!)
--> Environmental pollution (this is basically smoking on a large scale)
--> Paedophilia (I think we can all agree on this one)
--> Drug and human trafficking
--> And most importantly, Women who falsely cry rape.

Rape is somewhere after all this in terms of impact and seriousness. So why should we have the death penalty for rape? But if we gonna hang some poor sumbitch for rape, we might as well hang all those who do the above. Hell, as late as 1977 some states (mostly in bumfuck South like Georgia and Louisiana) in the US were imposing death sentences for rapists (Coker vs. Georgia 1977). Right now Philippines, Liberia and other states have laws that permit death penalties for rape, so why are these fucks ranting that Singapore hangs drug traffickers?

Almost forgot to discuss this, but what about instances when a woman falsely cries 'rape'? Rape is one of the easiest crimes to prove in most countries with functioning judicial systems. Hell, there have been so many instances where women falsely cry 'rape' to cover up their own skankiness and certainly has led to at least one wrong conviction. So if a woman who is convicted of falsely crying rape can get away with just twelve months of jail and some community service, why should a man who has been convicted of rape serve sixteen years (and get 24 cane strokes!)? When a man is suspected of rape his name is plastered all over the papers and even if he is acquitted, do you think anyone would want to give this guy a job?
Would anyone want this guy in their neighbourhood? Certainly not. So why should a woman who falsely cries rape be treated any less than a man who genuinely rapes a woman? The bitch should suffer as much, if not more than a man because not only is her crime serious enough, but she is also guilty of conspiring to frame the innocent and ruin his life. Hell, just put her in a cell with ten black guys with syphillis for a week and charge her $500 for a shot of penicillin. Use the money to fund a support group for men who have been victims of false charges. In the US actually rapists can be 'chemically castrated'. What the fuck is this? Saudi Arabia? Might as well start chopping off the arms of robbers and the tongues of the bitches who falsely cry rape.

What? Why is it that men have to pay greater restitution than women for the same gravity of the offence? If in Singapore women cannot be caned, but men can, why should the punishment therefore not be more severe for crimes committed by women to make up the imbalance?